Stamp Wall
Every politician earns stamps based on their public record. Some earn shame. Some earn grudging respect.
Stamps of Shame
Risk score under 25, yet 3+ criminal cases on file. The numbers say safe — the FIRs disagree.
3+ cases · risk ≤ 25Ghost representative. Attendance below 30% in legislature. Requires legislative attendance data — sourcing in progress. We refuse to guess.
Attendance below 30%Under 20% constituency funds utilized. The money exists. The will does not.
Under 20% funds usedCollected 3 or more negative stamps. A distinguished achievement.
3+ negative stamps3+ criminal cases with a risk score that reflects the stain. No low numbers to hide behind.
3+ cases · mid-to-high riskHighest overall risk score nationally among elected winners. The crown jewel of civic shame.
Highest national risk scoreDeclared assets over ₹50 crore with 5+ criminal cases. The wealth didn't buy clean hands.
₹50Cr+ assets · 5+ casesUnder 35 with risk score ≥ 50. Started early, peaked early.
Under 35 · risk ≥ 50Minimal assets declared but high criminal cases. Present in court, absent from constituency.
Sasta Neta in courtStamps of (Grudging) Respect
Risk score of 0 — zero criminal cases, zero flags. The rarest breed.
Risk score 0 · rarestZero criminal cases, zero pending charges, zero convictions. A clean and unblemished record.
0 cases · Clean recordDeclared assets under ₹50 lakh with no anomaly flags. Either genuinely modest or hiding it better than everyone else.
Assets under ₹50L · genuinely modestBest attendance and most questions asked in legislature. Requires legislative attendance data — sourcing in progress. We refuse to guess.
Best attendance + questionsUnder 35 with a low risk profile. Fresh blood in a geriatric system — and so far, keeping it clean.
Under 35 · clean profile